Has God Still "Had It"? LGBTQ+ Festival at the Dead Sea

A planned LGBTQ+ festival at the Dead Sea became the focus of a blunt and uneasy conversation on The Smith and Rowland Show. What caught Alan and Jeff's attention was not only the event itself, but the place, the timing, and the sense that a biblical warning is being ignored in plain sight.

If you follow current events through a Christian lens, this story presses on bigger questions. It raises questions about sin, government approval, national accountability, and whether some headlines carry more spiritual weight than they first appear.

"Text generated by [rightblogger] based on [Smith and Rowland Video "Has God Still Had It?)".

The show opened with jokes, then turned sharply serious

Alan and Jeff began the episode in the same loose style their audience knows well. They joked about who the real star of the show is, with a nod to producer Avery and the "fan mail" that supposedly settles the matter. They also admitted they were tired, which set up a string of tired-host humor that landed somewhere between corny and charming.

That included a fake sponsor bit about "Catnip," complete with jokes about changing the name to "Dog Nip" and a Barney Fife punchline about nipping something "in the bud." The humor was light, silly, and familiar. It gave the episode an easy start.

Then the mood changed.

Once they moved to the main subject, the banter gave way to a much harder discussion. They introduced a report about a large LGBTQ+ festival planned for the Dead Sea region in early June 2026. From that point on, the tone was serious and at times severe. Alan and Jeff treated the story as more than cultural news. They saw it as a moral and spiritual warning.

That contrast matters because it shows how strongly they reacted. This was not a routine political rant. They believed the event touched a place in Scripture that already carries the memory of judgment, and they spoke as if the symbolism alone should alarm Christians.

Why Jude 1:7 framed the whole episode

Before getting into the event details, the show turned to the book of Jude. Alan read the passage that framed the rest of the discussion:

"Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire."

That verse, Jude 1:7, gave them the lens for everything that followed. In their view, Jude is not only recalling an old judgment. He is holding up Sodom and Gomorrah as an example for later generations. The warning is still there.

Because of that, the hosts did not hear "festival at the Dead Sea" as a neutral headline. They heard it against the backdrop of Genesis 19 and Jude 1:7. They treated the site as land associated with one of the Bible's clearest pictures of divine wrath against sexual perversion and open rebellion.

Their concern was not limited to private sin. Public celebration, state promotion, and biblical memory all collided in one place. That is why they kept returning to the idea that this was different from another pride parade in another city.

For Christian listeners, this is the center of the episode. The argument rises or falls on whether you believe Scripture still speaks with authority over places, peoples, and public acts. Alan and Jeff clearly do. They saw Jude's warning as active, not archived.

What Pride Land is, and why the location matters

The event discussed on the show is called Pride Land. According to the report they read from, it is scheduled for June 1 through June 4, 2026, along the shores of the Dead Sea in Israel. Organizers expect thousands to attend, and it has been billed as the largest LGBT celebration the Middle East has seen.

The details they highlighted made the event sound expansive. The report described a temporary "pride city" in the Judean desert with hotels, beach venues, music stages, and family-friendly programming. That last phrase drew some of the strongest reaction from the hosts, who openly challenged the idea that such an event could be described as family-friendly.

This quick summary captures the details they focused on:

The hosts kept coming back to the slogan. On paper, it sounds like clever tourism language. In the context of Genesis 19, they heard something darker. The "lowest place on earth" is not only a geographic line about the Dead Sea basin. For Christians, it also points to the area long linked with Sodom and Gomorrah.

That is why the location mattered so much in their argument. America has hosted pride events for years. Israel has as well, and Tel Aviv is widely known as an LGBTQ-friendly city. Yet this felt different to them because of the setting. In their view, taking that celebration to ground associated with Sodom and Gomorrah is not random. It is either brazen symbolism or spiritual blindness.

Supporting Israel does not mean excusing sin

One of the clearest points in the episode was this: Alan and Jeff do not believe criticism of this event equals hatred of Israel. They went out of their way to say they stand with Israel because they believe God's Word still speaks about Israel, not because they see the modern state as morally clean.

That distinction shaped much of the discussion. They argued that Christians should not give Israel a free pass when its government promotes what Scripture condemns. In the same breath, they said America has little room to boast. Both nations, in their view, have promoted sexual immorality, public confusion about gender, and policies that normalize sin.

This line captured their position well:

"We stand with them because God's word says so."

That is not blind loyalty. It is a prophetic stance mixed with moral criticism.

They also rejected the idea that Christian criticism of homosexuality should be confused with cruelty or violence. Alan and Jeff contrasted biblical conviction with the brutality seen in parts of the Islamic world, where homosexuals have faced execution. Their point was plain: Christians can condemn a sinful lifestyle without harming people. Christianity is about following Jesus Christ, not acting as judge, executioner, or savior.

That led to a needed note about grace. They admitted that Christians fail, sin, and fall short. They stressed that the standard is Christ's perfection, not theirs. Alan quoted the promise that if we confess our sins, God is faithful and just to forgive and cleanse. That, they said, is also the message Christians bring to the LGBTQ community. Grace is real, but it does not rename sin as righteousness.

The spiritual reading behind the episode

Much of the episode moved beyond politics and into spiritual warfare. Alan argued that Sodom and Gomorrah were not only wicked cities in a moral sense. He believed a demonic power came to dominate that area because of the sin that took root there.

His order mattered. He did not say demons created the sin out of nowhere. He said the evil in men's hearts drew evil spirits. Then, once those spirits took hold in a place, they drew more darkness to themselves. Jeff agreed and built on that point.

To make the idea concrete, they compared it to places like Las Vegas. The thought was simple. Men carry corruption into a place. That corruption invites spiritual darkness. After that, the darkness has its own pull.

From there, they applied the same frame to Pride Land. In their view, people already given over to sexual confusion or perversion may be drawn to a site long tied to that kind of rebellion. Alan described it as a kind of gathering point, even likening it to a "mothership" that calls its own.

They also connected this to the biblical language of principalities and powers. Drawing from Ephesians 6 and Daniel 10, they spoke about a hierarchy of evil, including the "prince of Persia." Since Iran has been central to Israel's security concerns, Jeff floated a theory that a spiritual power tied to Persia may be shifting focus as the military balance changes.

This was one of the episode's boldest claims. They suggested that after natural missiles from Iran have been checked, a "spiritual missile" may be in flight through this event. In plain terms, they feared that Pride Land could open the door to a fresh wave of judgment, confusion, or conflict.

Politics, public sin, and the fear of judgment

The political backdrop also mattered. The hosts spoke about Israel's long conflict with Iran and the sense that Israel may feel freer at the moment because Iran has taken hits. In that setting, a state-backed celebration at the Dead Sea looked to them less like confidence and more like dangerous pride.

They also pointed out how this plays in the wider region. Islamic critics have long called the United States the "great Satan" and Israel the "little Satan." Alan and Jeff did not agree with Islamic violence, but they admitted that events like this hand propaganda to Israel's enemies. When a government promotes what Scripture calls abomination, it becomes harder to claim moral seriousness.

Another biblical parallel came up in the discussion of Babylon's feast. Alan referenced the story of the king's household using vessels from the house of God for a profane party, after which judgment fell. That image stayed with them because they believed Pride Land could be another moment when a culture mocks what God has already judged.

They returned several times to the same fear: what if this is a line-crossing event?

For them, the issue is not whether sin exists in every nation. The issue is public, organized, celebrated sin, tied to a place where God had already said "enough." Alan put it plainly. If God had enough there once, he does not see why that would be reversed now.

They also applied this to democratic accountability. Jeff used American politics as an example. If people elect wicked leaders, the nation still lives with the results. By that logic, if the Israeli government, or part of it, promotes this event, national consequences may follow. And because America is tied closely to Israel, they feared the fallout may not stop at Israel's border.

The questions they raised about organizers and state backing

Late in the episode, the conversation turned to who is behind Pride Land. They said the festival is being organized by a private production group and mentioned the names Aaron Cohen and Jonathan Gadol, with X Production tied to the event. They also said the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs has heavily promoted it.

Still, they were careful at one point to admit uncertainty. While looking into Aaron Cohen live, they were not fully sure whether one public profile they found referred to the same person connected to the event. That caution matters. They raised the question, but they did not claim firm proof on that specific identity issue.

What they did treat as clear was the government connection. In their reading, this is not a fringe event hiding on the margins. It has visible promotion from official Israeli channels.

That left them with more questions than answers. How much of the Israeli government is directly involved? Is this a tourism push, an ideological push, or both? Who approved the messaging? Those questions stayed open by the end of the show, and they said they wanted to look deeper.

Final thoughts on what the episode was really warning about

The strongest point from this episode was not about a festival alone. It was about the collision of place, sin, and public approval. Alan and Jeff believe that when a government helps celebrate what God judged at Sodom, on land associated with Sodom, Christians should not shrug and move on.

They also made another point that should not be missed. Christian faith does not excuse national sin, whether that sin is in Israel or the United States. At the same time, the gospel still offers mercy to sinners, because grace is for the repentant, not the self-righteous.

Their closing concern was simple and heavy. Many people will pass this story by as one more culture-war headline. They do not think it is small, and after hearing their case, it is clear why they see it as a warning sign.