Dispensationalism protects how you read Scripture and how you guard Truth. In this Introduction episode, Smith and Rowland explain why that matters now.
In Ep. 856 (February 19, 2026), the conversation starts with a headline moment: Doug Wilson and Tucker Carlson, and what their discussion revealed about Israel, American foreign policy, and the growing influence of replacement theology. From there, the episode locks in on the bigger issue, how people handle the Bible and why "rightly dividing" isn't optional.
You'll hear a clear case for Dispensationalism as a framework (not a hobby or a trend) that keeps words from changing meaning. The hosts tie that framework to the Constitution, because the same fight shows up in both places. Do we take the text as written, or do we let culture rewrite it?
Topics covered in this episode include:
* Why the Doug Wilson and Tucker Carlson conversation felt one-sided
* Dispensationalism vs. replacement theology, and why the difference isn't small
* Why "literal" reading protects doctrine instead of flattening it
* How "rightly divide" implies people can wrongly divide
* Why hyper-dispensationalism distorts Truth instead of guarding it
* How the Constitution debate mirrors the Bible debate
If you care about Bible interpretation, Christian doctrine, and how theology affects real public life, this episode sets the foundation. Subscribe for the follow-up, because this is only the start.
#Dispensationalism #BibleStudy #ChristianTheology #ReplacementTheology #Truth
Comments